The Middle Ages · 1079 – 1142

Peter Abelard

阿伯拉尔 · Petrus Abaelardus

The sharpest logician of the twelfth century, a conceptualist on universals, and through his tragedy with Héloïse the most famous man of the Middle Ages.

ScholasticismNominalismBirthplace: Le Pallet, Brittany

By doubting we come to inquiry, and by inquiry we arrive at truth.

Source: Sic et Non, prologue

Abelard was the eldest son of a Breton knight who gave up his inheritance to pursue dialectic. In Paris he studied under the realist William of Champeaux, soon reduced his master to silence in debate, and set up his own school, to which students flocked. He called himself the only philosopher never defeated, and his arrogance made enemies everywhere.

Around 1115 he became master at the cathedral school of Notre-Dame and tutor to Héloïse, niece of the canon Fulbert. They fell in love; she became pregnant; they married in secret; Fulbert had him castrated by night. He entered the abbey of Saint-Denis and she a convent, and their later letters are the most moving documents of the Middle Ages. His theology was condemned and burned at Soissons in 1121 and condemned again at Sens in 1140 at the instance of Bernard of Clairvaux; he died at Cluny on his way to appeal to Rome.

On universals he opposed both realism and crude nominalism: a universal is not a thing and not a mere sound but a meaningful word pointing to a 'status' that particulars share. Sic et Non set one hundred and fifty-eight contradictory statements of the Church Fathers side by side and asked the reader to judge by reason, a method that became the standard form of scholasticism. His ethics held that sin lies not in the deed but in the intention, a revolutionary claim in its day.

Key Ideas

Conceptualism

Universals are neither things nor empty names but meaningful concepts that capture what particulars have in common.

The method of Sic et Non

Set the contradictory statements of authorities side by side and resolve them by dialectic. Doubt begins inquiry, and inquiry leads to truth.

The ethics of intention

Deeds in themselves are morally neutral; good and evil lie in the agent's consent and intention.