Incredulity toward metanarratives
Modernity legitimated all knowledge and institutions by grand narratives of emancipation, progress, Spirit or revolution. The postmodern is no longer believing them.
The Twentieth Century to Today · 1924 – 1998
利奥塔
The postmodern condition: incredulity toward grand narratives, knowledge turned into information commodity, incommensurable language-games between which lie differends no tribunal can settle, and philosophy's task to bear witness to the unpresentable.
Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity toward metanarratives.
Source: The Postmodern Condition, introduction
Lyotard was born in Versailles to a salesman's family and as a boy wanted to be a monk, a painter or a historian. He studied philosophy at the Sorbonne alongside Deleuze, passed the agrégation in 1950, and taught two years in a lycée in Constantine in French Algeria, where he saw colonial rule at first hand. In 1954 he joined Socialisme ou Barbarie, the far-left group founded by Castoriadis and Lefort that analysed the Soviet Union as bureaucratic capitalism; he handled the Algerian question and wrote analyses for twelve years, leaving in 1966 after losing faith in the revolutionary subject.
His first book, Phenomenology (1954), was a slim introduction. His doctoral thesis, Discourse, Figure (1971), used Freud and Merleau-Ponty against structuralism, arguing that beneath the discourse of language lies a visual, desiring 'figural' dimension irreducible to any system of signs. Libidinal Economy (1974), his wildest book, pushed Marx and Freud toward a philosophy affirming the intensities of desire; he later called it 'my evil book'. He taught at Vincennes alongside Deleuze and Badiou.
The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1979), commissioned by the government of Quebec, made him famous worldwide. Modernity, it argued, legitimated knowledge and institutions by 'grand narratives', the Enlightenment story of emancipation, Hegel's story of Spirit, Marx's story of revolution, and the postmodern is 'incredulity toward metanarratives'. In the computer age knowledge becomes saleable information, and legitimacy can come only from local 'little narratives' and from 'paralogy', the rule-breaking invention within language-games. The book gave postmodernism its definition and drew Habermas's criticism.
The Differend (1983) is the book he considered his most important philosophical work: when two parties to a dispute speak by different rules, any judgement wrongs one of them, and that is a 'differend'; the Holocaust denier's demand that victims produce evidence is the paradigm, and philosophy's task is to find new phrases for wrongs that existing phrases cannot express. In his last years he wrote on the Kantian sublime, the inhuman, childhood, Malraux and Augustine, taught at Irvine and Emory, and died of leukaemia in Paris in 1998.
Modernity legitimated all knowledge and institutions by grand narratives of emancipation, progress, Spirit or revolution. The postmodern is no longer believing them.
In the information society knowledge is no longer produced for truth or emancipation but as saleable, machine-processable information, and performativity becomes the sole criterion.
A dispute between heterogeneous discourses has no shared rule of judgement, and any verdict wrongs one side. Justice demands new phrases for wrongs that cannot yet be said.
Modern art presents the fact that there is something unpresentable. The postmodern is not what comes after the modern but the sublime that keeps beginning again within it.
Science lives not by consensus but by dissent: inventing new rules, new language-games, producing counter-examples. Legitimacy comes from invention, not agreement.
In his last decades he read the third Critique again and again; the sublime, the failure of imagination before what cannot be presented, became his key to modern art and the postmodern condition.
The central tool of The Postmodern Condition and The Differend is the language-game: no metalanguage can adjudicate all games, and between heterogeneous discourses there are disputes that cannot be settled.
He spent twelve years as a Marxist militant in the group Socialisme ou Barbarie, reporting on the Algerian war, left in 1966, and thereafter treated Marxism as one of the grandest of grand narratives.
Adorno's 'after Auschwitz' was one of his starting points: an event that no narrative can absorb, to which thought can only bear witness.